Considerations in attending to artworks made in Art Therapy or Arts & Health
The Considerations
Note: Word or phrases marked by an asterisk (*) are defined in the Glossary.
About you
e.g. Are you the person who supported, facilitated, witnessed or encouraged the making of the artwork?
e.g. Has your institution acquired archives or collections which included the artwork?
e.g. Have you inherited the artwork?
e.g. Has the artwork been donated to you or your institution?
e.g. Have you purchased the artwork?
e.g. Was the artwork ‘left with you’?
If it was gifted/donated/left with you, were there any expectations of confidentiality?
Are you the person who supported, facilitated, witnessed or encouraged the making of the artwork?
e.g. Could expectations of confidentiality be inferred from the context in which the work was made?
e.g. If a lot of time has passed since the making of the artwork, would expectations of confidentiality be different now compared to when the work was made? Would they be higher or lower?
Do you regard yourself as the maker of the artwork?
If yes, why so?
If not, why not?
Do you regard yourself as the co-maker of the artwork?
If yes, why so?
If not, why not?
e.g. Would the work not have been created without your support, involvement or instructions?
e.g. Did you commission the work?
e.g. Was the work made under your patronage
About the artist(s) or maker(s)
How many people were involved in making the artwork?
If yes, can you (physically) contact them and ask for their consent?
Is there a risk to them or other people if you do so?
Is there a risk of breaching confidentiality if you contact them?
Would it be a ‘betrayal’ of the maker (client or participant) to give their family such ‘power’?
Should other information about the person be disclosed?
Could a viewer infer more information about the person from the context in which you are using the artwork? What might this be? Would this represent a risk to the confidentiality/privacy of the maker/artist? Is there a risk of causing them upset?
Would you consider sharing part or total of the decision-making in attending to the artwork in the future?
Would you consider displaying a notice to that effect along with the artwork (if appropriate and in cases where the author/maker/artist or owner of the artwork is unknown at the time of you attending to the piece)?
If there is a financial gain associated with the artwork, would you consider sharing it with this person?
Are you aware of any legal obligations they may be responsible for in relation to the artwork, such as confidentiality?
Should this person be mentioned or identified alongside the artwork? In answering this question, consider:
whether this would risk causing upset to the author/maker/artist of the artwork or their relatives;
whether omitting the name of the person who facilitated the session would in some key way misrepresent the context in which the piece was created.
About the person(s) represented in the artwork
If yes, is it appropriate for you to contact them, to ask for their consent or notify them of your plans in attending to the artwork?
If you think it is not appropriate to contact them, why not?
If yes, can you mitigate this, and how?
What steps are you prepared to take if someone comes forward and claims they are represented, misrepresented or referenced in the artwork?
About the artwork
When (what date or period of time) was the artwork made?
What are the size and media of the artwork?
Where was the work made?
In what context, was the work made? Do you have information about the creative process or methods used to enable the creation of the works?
e.g. Historic?
e.g. Cultural?
e.g. Financial?
e.g. Personal or emotional?
e.g. Symbolic?
About your use of/attending to the artwork
How are you planning on using, looking after or disposing of the work*?
e.g. specialist or professional training
e.g. generating revenues
e.g. publicity
e.g. conservation, preservation, archiving
e.g. creative expression, entertainment, aesthetic
Are you disclosing personal, private or confidential information about people referenced in the artwork?
Is the sensitive information, if any, in the public domain already?
Will your use of the artwork make this information more accessible to the public? Is this intentional? What would be the balance of harm and benefits?
e.g. specialist public (readership of a specialist professional journals or reviews; multidisciplinary teams)
e.g. public pre-selected by yourself (your students; attendees to a conference)
e.g. are you giving advice or permission(s) about posting the artwork on social media?
e.g. are you giving advice or permission(s) about the language around the piece, and how to comment on it?
How likely is it that the artwork will be re-used by the public (e.g. online or on social media)?
What are the risks of mis-use of the artworks by the public you shared it with?
What are the costs associated with you taking into account these considerations and steps to mitigate the risks they may raise?
What is the balance of those costs in light of the risks involved?
If you arrive at the conclusion that the artwork should not be shown or shared, or should even be destroyed or disposed of
Should an artist’s response be made?
Should there be information about the artist’s rationale for responding to the artwork?
Should a ‘fictionalization’ of the artwork be made and replace the artwork?
Should there be information about the rationale for the ‘fictionalization’?